Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Bird Summary

In summarizing Gloria Bird’s article one notices immediately that Bird is using her personal life experience and the American Indian’s experience to draw from Silko’s novel “Ceremony”. In her article she focuses on topic colonization in both the story and in the lives of herself and her family which she parallels to the experiences of Tayo in ceremony. Using the story as a tool Bird tries to define the experience of colonization and gain a better understanding of it and its byproduct.

In Bird’s article she also introduces this idea of there being multiple dual consciousnesses throughout the book and in Native American thinking that all stem from the American Indian Experience in the United States. One of the first examples Bird gives of there being a dual consciousness is in the mind. She says that the only way to undo the process of colonization is through decolonizing the mind at the same time she thinks of her people as a dying people like the process intended for the American Indians to think.

Another example she give is language and how it was used as a key tool to enforce colonization. Bird acknowledges the fact that she too like Tayo in “Ceremony” has a lack of knowledge and understanding of their languages and must struggle to gather meaning of it. She identifies this as a second kind of consciousness. This being a kind of guilt because of your lack of knowledge but at the same time liberation because of your new confidence in knowing that the blame comes from that process of colonization. Through the entire article she uses many other examples but mainly focuses on the affects of the consciousness of colonization and decolonization as a way of understanding the American Indians struggle.

7 comments:

  1. This is very well written. It covers the main points and gives a good depiction of the essay. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agreed that Bird used her own personal experiences to connect to the book. I too wrote about her focus on language, and her goal of understanding colonization. Good summary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. great job! your points were good although you definitely could have gone a little more in depth with your explanations. keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good summary. I think that you captured Bird's main idea in the short word limit that we were given. Maybe without the second example in your summary, you would have had more room to summarize the article.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really liked your insight in the last paragraph about the shame and liberation that comes with a lack of understanding/knowledge - good job!

    ReplyDelete
  6. You did a good job of conveying what the article was about. I like how you point out a couple of examples from her article and identify that Bird puts herself in the text as well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The main points of the essay are nicely covered and you are well-articulated, but still relatively concise. I feel like the summary should've been just a hair shorter, though. A nice summary, overall. Great work!

    ReplyDelete